[phenixbb] Phenix.ensemble_refinment questions
joseph.brock at ki.se
Thu Nov 13 06:46:13 PST 2014
Dear Phenix community,
I was hoping that some of you may be able to clarify some questions about Phenix.ensemble_refinement:
1. In the associated publication (Burnley et al. eLife 2012;), the ensemble refinement is validated by comparing the correlation of the ensemble generated map, with the map generated from the experimental phases for PDB entry 1YTT ("The overall correlation coefficient between the electron-density map from the ensemble model (obtained without experimental phases) and the experimentally phased electron-density map was 0.903, compared with 0.873 and 0.895 for the published and re-refined single structures. These seemingly small improvements in over- all quality indicators allow for significant local improvements."). I am confused how one computes an experimentally phased from structure factors deposited in the PDB that contain only anomalous intensities/amplitudes and not Hendrickson-Lattman coefficients. Is there a program within the phenix package that can do this?
In addition, the phenix.ensemble_refinement keywords include:
* file_name = None
* labels = None
Is it possible to include experimental phases during the rolling average refinement process and could this be beneficial (if the phases were of a sufficient quality)?
2. Is the correct procedure in parameter optimisation to optimise pTLS, then temperature offest and then tx? Or is it possible that the best ensemble may be generated from any (non-directional) combination of the above parameters?
3. What is the function of the "nproc" keyword? If this is the number of CPU cores that can be used in parallel, what is the most efficient way of using phenix.ensemble_refinement on a cluster?
4. Can anybody suggest a good way to compare the ensembles generated by phenix.ensemble_refinement with the trajectories of traditional MD simulations (for e.g. produced by NAMD? ;)
Finally, I noticed that I cannot run phenix.ensemble_refinement using a "my_parameters.eff" file, it is necessary to type on the command line.
Alternatively, the queueing system for the supercomputer I use is managed by SLURM, however, I cannot submit batch jobs via the appropriate command sbatch with anything other than default parameters (keywords in a parameters.eff or that are typed explicitly following the mycoords.pdb mydata.mtz myrestraints.cif files are not incorporated into the resulting parameters of the .log file).
Could these issues be due to my local environment setup?
I am running Phenix 1.9-1692 Platform: intel-linux-2.6-x86_64 redhat-e6.5.
Sorry for the long email and many thanks in advance for you help!
Joseph Brock | PhD
Division of Physiological Chemistry II
Department of Medical Biochemistry and Biophysics
Scheeles väg 2
SE-171 77 Stockholm, Sweden
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the phenixbb