[phenixbb] pdb deposition
Pavel Afonine
pafonine at lbl.gov
Fri Oct 24 12:01:26 PDT 2014
Hi Sneha,
typical R-factors at this resolution are (using
"phenix.r_factor_statistics 1.9" command):
Histogram of Rwork for models in PDB at resolution 1.80-2.00 A:
0.093 - 0.118 : 4
0.118 - 0.143 : 216
0.143 - 0.168 : 2142
0.168 - 0.193 : 5011
0.193 - 0.218 : 3592
0.218 - 0.243 : 1090 <<< your case
0.243 - 0.268 : 151
0.268 - 0.293 : 20
0.293 - 0.319 : 1
0.319 - 0.344 : 3
Histogram of Rfree for models in PDB at resolution 1.80-2.00 A:
0.138 - 0.163 : 40
0.163 - 0.189 : 651
0.189 - 0.214 : 3178
0.214 - 0.240 : 4512
0.240 - 0.265 : 2809 <<< your case
0.265 - 0.290 : 854
0.290 - 0.316 : 159
0.316 - 0.341 : 22
0.341 - 0.367 : 3
0.367 - 0.392 : 2
Histogram of Rfree-Rwork for all model in PDB at resolution 1.80-2.00 A:
0.000 - 0.010 : 97
0.010 - 0.020 : 683
0.020 - 0.030 : 2367
0.030 - 0.040 : 3800 <<< your case
0.040 - 0.050 : 3085
0.050 - 0.060 : 1422
0.060 - 0.070 : 511
0.070 - 0.080 : 172
0.080 - 0.090 : 73
0.090 - 0.100 : 20
Number of structures considered: 12230
..so, in terms of R-factors your are fine.
Run Comprehensive validation in Phenix GUI and check all "red flags". I
would say you need to be able to explain rotamer/Ramachandran outliers
or fix them otherwise.
Pavel
On 10/24/14 11:50 AM, Sneha Rangarajan wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> For a 1.9A dataset, here are my statistics-
>
> Rfactors: 22/26
>
> Ramachandran favored: 90.60%
>
> Ramachandran outliers: 2.17%
>
> Rotamer outliers: 4%
>
> Clashscore: 8
>
> Bonds: 0.007
>
> Angles: 1.2
>
> I have tried a couple of things to refine it further but nothing seems
> to improve all the parameters.
>
> My question is what is an acceptable Rfactor at this resolution for
> deposition in pdb?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Sneha
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://phenix-online.org/pipermail/phenixbb/attachments/20141024/12346da5/attachment.htm>
More information about the phenixbb
mailing list