[phenixbb] FW: Occupancy / alternate conformation Refinement
Christian Roth
christianroth034 at gmail.com
Tue Jul 17 07:03:14 PDT 2018
Ahh I see. Yes I think you are better off letting the Asn be an amino acid
and have the ligand on its own. with an appropriate link record.
Good luck!
Christian
On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 3:52 PM Schulz, Eike-Christian <
eike.schulz at mpsd.mpg.de> wrote:
> Hi Christian,
>
>
>
> the Asn side chain is to which the ligand attaches has only 1 conformation
> – hence the occupancy for all these atoms is 1.
>
>
>
> … but using a LINK might be a good option.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> Eike
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From: *Christian Roth <christianroth034 at gmail.com>
> *Date: *Tuesday, 17. July 2018 at 15:25
> *To: *Eike-Christian Schulz <eike.schulz at mpsd.mpg.de>
> *Cc: *PHENIX user mailing list <phenixbb at phenix-online.org>
> *Subject: *Re: [phenixbb] FW: Occupancy / alternate conformation
> Refinement
>
>
>
> Hi Eike,
>
> why have some of your ligand atoms have occupancy of 1 and some 0.5.? I
> have had thought all atoms of the ligand are 0.5 for the two states and you
> create a link for one of them to which is the intermediate. You might have
> to add a constrained group as well, though nowadays phenix might handle
> that automatically.
>
>
>
> Cheers
>
> Christian
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 3:15 PM Schulz, Eike-Christian <
> eike.schulz at mpsd.mpg.de> wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> In one of my structures I appear to have a mixed state between a
> covalently bound intermediate and the free substrate occupying _almost_ the
> same position. I can model the states nicely in coot, but during refinement
> the molecules “fly” apart - although the occupancy was limited to 0.5 for
> their overlapping atoms.
>
> I have tried to model the free ligand as an alternate conformation of
> the covalent intermediate:
>
> HETATM 852 N ASB A 110 10.523 15.702 10.022 1.00 14.48
> N
> HETATM 853 CA ASB A 110 9.974 15.713 8.664 1.00 15.11
> C
> HETATM 854 C ASB A 110 8.635 16.385 8.683 1.00 14.31
> C
> HETATM 855 O ASB A 110 8.563 17.443 9.233 1.00 13.03
> O
> HETATM 856 CB ASB A 110 10.053 14.307 8.091 1.00 11.72
> C
> HETATM 857 CG ASB A 110 9.774 14.157 6.621 1.00 15.26
> C
> HETATM 858 OD1 ASB A 110 10.688 14.485 5.644 1.00 19.29
> O
> HETATM 859 OD2 ASB A 110 8.693 13.880 6.340 1.00 13.36
> O
> HETATM 860 C1 AASB A 110 10.637 15.649 3.353 0.50 27.61
> C
> HETATM 861 C2 AASB A 110 10.231 14.480 4.266 0.50 32.98
> C
> HETATM 862 O1 AASB A 110 11.505 16.454 3.690 0.50 31.63
> O
> HETATM 863 O2 AASB A 110 10.085 15.787 2.280 0.50 21.80
> O
> HETATM 4742 O2 BASB A 110 10.072 15.815 2.191 0.50 24.78
> O
> HETATM 4743 C1 BASB A 110 10.573 15.717 3.221 0.50 28.20
> C
> HETATM 4744 O1 BASB A 110 11.449 16.458 3.619 0.50 22.71
> O
> HETATM 4745 C2 BASB A 110 10.107 14.567 4.152 0.50 19.02
> C
> HETATM 4746 F BASB A 110 9.287 13.735 3.610 0.50 34.13
> F
>
> Although I have provided a new CIF file for the ligand named according
> to the alternate conformation this causes phenix to crash.
>
> How can I correctly refine these overlapping atoms ?
>
> Thanks for your advice,
>
> Eike
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> phenixbb mailing list
> phenixbb at phenix-online.org
> http://phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/phenixbb
> Unsubscribe: phenixbb-leave at phenix-online.org
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://phenix-online.org/pipermail/phenixbb/attachments/20180717/c79472d6/attachment.htm>
More information about the phenixbb
mailing list