Hi Carsten,<div><br></div><div>yes, it makes sense, I will do it by the end of May.</div><div><br></div><div>Pavel.<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 5:43 PM, Schubert, Carsten [PRDUS] <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:CSCHUBER@its.jnj.com">CSCHUBER@its.jnj.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<div>
<p dir="LTR"><span lang="en-us"><font face="Calibri">Hi</font></span><span lang="en-us"> <font face="Calibri">Pavel,</font></span></p>
<p dir="LTR"><span lang="en-us"><font face="Calibri">do you think it would be possible to extend the statistics printed out by</font></span><span lang="en-us"> <font face="Calibri">phenix.model_vs_data</font></span><span lang="en-us"><font face="Calibri">, so it also does a break-down by</font></span><span lang="en-us"> <font face="Calibri">chains? Right now the stats are listed by residue type, i.e.</font></span><span lang="en-us"> <font face="Calibri">protein/ligand/solvent/etc. For instance if I am interested in the B-factors of a glycosylated protein with ligands</font></span><span lang="en-us"><font face="Calibri">, the sugars and ligands all get muddled together. Breaking this down by chains as well would allow for finer control.</font></span></p>
<p dir="LTR"><span lang="en-us"><font face="Calibri">Cheers,</font></span></p>
<p dir="LTR"><span lang="en-us">������� <font face="Calibri">Carsten</font></span></p>
<p dir="LTR"><span lang="en-us"></span></p>
</div>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
phenixbb mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:phenixbb@phenix-online.org">phenixbb@phenix-online.org</a><br>
<a href="http://phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/phenixbb" target="_blank">http://phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/phenixbb</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>