<font color="#000000"><font>Thanks,<br>It worked perfectly.<br></font></font><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 8:48 PM, Nathaniel Echols <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:nechols@lbl.gov">nechols@lbl.gov</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="im">On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 5:01 PM, Page, Rebecca <<a href="mailto:rebecca_page@brown.edu">rebecca_page@brown.edu</a>> wrote:<br>
> I have a protein in which the N-terminal residue is in two<br>
> conformations.When the residue is in the 'A' conformation, the sidechain<br>
> overlaps with the 'A' conformation sidechain density of its symmetry mate. I<br>
> have modeled the occupancy at 50%. However, every time I refine, phenix<br>
> pushes the 'A' conformer out of the density, likely due to clashing with its<br>
> symmetry mate.<br>
><br>
> Is there anyway to get around this?<br>
<br>
</div>I think this is what the parameter<br>
"custom_nonbonded_symmetry_exclusions" is for - it specifies an atom<br>
selection for which to turn off these interactions.<br>
<br>
-Nat<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
phenixbb mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:phenixbb@phenix-online.org">phenixbb@phenix-online.org</a><br>
<a href="http://phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/phenixbb" target="_blank">http://phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/phenixbb</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br><br>�<br>