<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Hello,<br>
<br>
Both should be approximately the same, i.e. similar (there is a
range of slopes that agree with your Luzzatti plots, depending on
where the low resolution limit is set to compute the slope for
example). The difference you observe is fine. If you had 100 sq A
for one and 50 sq A for the other then I'd start to worry. The two
figures you quote are off by 25%...<br>
<br>
HTH,<br>
<br>
Fred.<br>
<br>
PS this has been discussed before on another crystallographic bb,
ccp4bb (please note that this isn't an advertisement for the
ccp4bb)<br>
<br>
On 23/03/13 14:53, Florian Brückner wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:E9554617-5125-4DC7-AD2D-A68ECA2417EB@psi.ch"
type="cite">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
charset=ISO-8859-1">
Thanks, Pavel.
<div><br>
</div>
<div>So you don't think that the difference between Wilson B
(66.45 according to phenix) and average B (52 after refinement)
is still too large? Where did you take the statistics from? Is
that published anywhere?</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Best regards</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Florian</div>
</blockquote>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
Fred. Vellieux (B.Sc., Ph.D., hdr)
ouvrier de la recherche
IBS / ELMA
41 rue Jules Horowitz
F-38027 Grenoble Cedex 01
Tel: +33 438789605
Fax: +33 438785494</pre>
</body>
</html>