<div dir="ltr">On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 12:57 PM, Pavel Afonine <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:pafonine@lbl.gov" target="_blank">pafonine@lbl.gov</a>></span> wrote:<div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Depending which kind of differences you mean (magnitude). Ideally, R-factors should be identical. If it's like 0.1856 vs 0.1858, then it's fine, if larger then some of us here need to investigate what's going on.<br>
</blockquote><div><br></div><div>Agreed, since the Table 1 program is using phenix.model_vs_data internally, which was designed to reproduce the R-factors from phenix.refine, any major discrepancy is cause for concern. �We have seen a handful of cases where they deviate significantly, but it's been very difficult to isolate the cause, so data is always helpful. �(Of course this doesn't rule out the possibility that there's simply a bug in my code somewhere, but I don't think the program is doing anything fancy.)</div>
<div><br></div><div>-Nat</div></div></div></div>