- phenixbb - phenix-online.org

Re: [phenixbb] Question about refinement group definition
by Shota Nakamura 20 Nov '12

20 Nov '12

中村昇太 Pavel Afonine <pafonine(a)lbl.gov>: >Hi Carsten, > >some keywords have type "multiple" and some not. In your example, >rigid_body has type multiple, that is you can specify as many of them as >you want: > >rigid_body = chain A >rigid_body = chain B >rigid_body = chain C > >and that means you will be refining three rigid bodies. Same applied to >tls, and many others. > >anisotropic is not multiple, so it can be only one. I recall I had >reasons to make it this way when implementing it but it was long long >time ago, so I forgot what it was. > >To see all attributes for all parameters: >phenix.refine --show-defaults=all.all > >which will yield a long hard to digest list. > >Pavel > >On 11/20/12 6:25 PM, Schubert, Carsten [JRDUS] wrote: >> Hello all, >> >> I have a question about the parameter definition for refinement groups (hope I picked the right term here). How does the definition and handling of refinement groups vary from the "refine.sites.rigid_body" scope to the "refine.adp.anisotropic" scope? For instance: >> >> refine { >> strategy = *individual_sites individual_sites_real_space *rigid_body \ >> *individual_adp group_adp tls *occupancies group_anomalous >> sites { >> individual = None >> torsion_angles = None >> rigid_body = chain A >> rigid_body = chain B >> } >> adp { >> individual { >> isotropic = None >> anisotropic = chain A >> anisotropic = chain B >> >> } >> >> would refine chains A and B as separate rigid groups, whereas only chain B would be refined anisotropically. >> Is this an intended behavior? >> >> BTW "anisotropic = chain A or chain B" refines both chains as expected. >> >> Cheers, >> >> Carsten >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> phenixbb mailing list >> phenixbb(a)phenix-online.org >> http://phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/phenixbb > >_______________________________________________ >phenixbb mailing list >phenixbb(a)phenix-online.org >http://phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/phenixbb

1 0

radiation damaged residues occupancy refinement
by Mikalai Lapkouski 20 Nov '12

20 Nov '12

Hello, I have a 1.2A model with the signs of radiation damage, judged by the negative peaks around the carboxyls (atoms CD, OE1 and OE2) of glutamates probably due to decarboxylation. I wan to refine occupancy of those atoms to account for negative density. What is the proper way of doing it? I tried to set the occupancy for those atoms 0.8 and refine individually. But obviously occupancies for those atoms are individually refined to different values which I dont think is the right way. Is there a way of how to refine occupancies for those atoms so that they remain identical after refinement (say all have 0.6)? Or is there another procedure of how to deal with refinement of radiation damaged side-chains? Any suggestions, please? Thank you Nick

2 4

Job history recovery
by Damian Niegowski 20 Nov '12

20 Nov '12

Hello all, I have run into a problem with the Job History tab in the GUI. For one project there is a listing of 16 jobs but when I try going into Job History there is nothing. The .phenix directory for that project is present and all other directories of the individual jobs are there. Is there a way to "restore" the job history from existing parameter files? Regards, Damian Damian Niegowski Ph.D. Institute of Medical Biochemistry and Biophysics Karolinska Institutet Scheeles väg 2 171 77 STOCKHOLM e-mail: damian.niegowski(a)ki.se phone: 0046 8 524 876 33 fax: 0046 8 736 04 39

2 1

Refining Anomalous Groups
by Brennan Bonnet 20 Nov '12

20 Nov '12

Hi All, I am trying to use phenix.refine to refine partially occupied xenon sites using the Anomalous Groups selection under "Refinement settings". My list of anomalous scatters initially consisted of 22 peaks as located by HySS. Some of these were removed as they originated from S atoms from Met and Cys residues and a few others were removed after previous refinement steps due to having zero occupancy. My remaining sites consist of my xenons (hopefully) and other metals such as Mg or Zn which are mixed in and look like partially occupied xenon sites. My problem is that when I try to define the 11 remaining sites for the "refine anomalous groups" selection the software complains: Invalid combination: F-obs not anomalous, but refinement of 11 f_double_prime values requested (11 scatterers): Please provide anomalous reflection data or fix all f_double_prime values (see refinement.refine.anomalous_scatterer.group input blocks) I can't figure out exactly what I need to change to make it work and can't find a guide anywhere. Do I need to provide additional data or is the syntax for the sites incorrect maybe? Please help! ~Brennan~

3 5

Phaser
by Morten Groftehauge 19 Nov '12

19 Nov '12

Hi guys, I was trying out the new Parallel Phaser (dev-1214) and using a model prepared by Rosetta covering 25% of the total structure (32% identity to the homology model), NCS = 2. 5 models actually but not really relevant since the program spontaneously stopped running after a couple of hours (I love what it's supposed to do though!). My question is about the log however. In the Parallel Phaser log it says: Expected LLG and Resolution Limits ---------------------------------- Expected LLG target: 120.00 Expected LLG achieved: 120.0 Resolution of All Data: 2.38 Resolution limited by eLLG target: 4.83 This resolution WILL NOT be used as the default The expected LLG achieved is greater than 120 (eLLG target) but when I tried to recreate that run in the regular Phaser-MR I get this message in the log Expected LLG and Resolution Limits ---------------------------------- Expected LLG target: 120.00 Expected LLG achieved: 49.7 Resolution of All Data: 2.38 Resolution limited by eLLG target: 2.38 This resolution WILL NOT be used as the default The expected LLG achieved is less than 60 (half eLLG target) FTF rescoring WILL be performed due to low expected LLG signal Deep search will be performed from the start I think the second result looks more realistic (unfortunately) but I still don't understand why the difference? Cheers, Morten PS Seems like there's a memory leak in 1214 and 1207 when I run the Phaser step of MR_Rosetta. Does this sound right? Definitely in 1207 but it seems like it's still there in 1214. -- Morten K Grøftehauge, PhD Pohl Group Durham University

4 6

SASTBX server
by Tanner, John J. 19 Nov '12

19 Nov '12

I apologize if this is an inappropriate post for phenixbb… Has anyone had trouble with the SASTBX server lately? I have been getting this error since Friday when calculating shapes and P(r). Server error! The server encountered an internal error and was unable to complete your request. Error message: Premature end of script headers: cctbx_web.cgi If you think this is a server error, please contact the webmaster<mailto:[email protected]>. Error 500 sastbx.als.lbl.gov<http://sastbx.als.lbl.gov/> Fri Nov 16 07:56:37 2012 Apache/2.2.17 (Unix) PHP/5.3.4

3 2

fwd: West Coast Protein Crystallography Workshop
by Nathaniel Echols 18 Nov '12

18 Nov '12

(There will probably be several people from our group attending this year.) ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: "Williams, John Charles" <jwilliams(a)coh.org> To: "phenixbb(a)phenix-online.org" <phenixbb(a)phenix-online.org> Cc: Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2012 08:15:19 -0800 Subject: West Coast Protein Crystallography Workshop All, Wayne Hendrickson will be the keynote speaker for the West Coast Protein Crystallography Workshop, scheduled for March 17th - March 20th at the Monterey Plaza and Spa. Registration will open up Dec 1st. Hope to see you there! Best, John Williams WCPCW Organizer

1 0

v1.8.1 installation hangs
by Alex Theodossis 17 Nov '12

17 Nov '12

Hi, I'm attempting to install the latest version of phenix on mac 10.5.8, using the command line installer. Installation proceeds well until towards the end, where it hangs on: precompiling .py files I can leave it for up to an hour without any further progress, but upon typing: ctrl+c The installation comes back to life and proceeds to completion. Can anyone advise as to what might be causing this and on how reliable this installation is going to be? Thanks in advance.

2 1

Alternate conformation occupancies sum more than 1
by Mikalai Lapkouski 15 Nov '12

15 Nov '12

Hello, I was refining the 1.2 A structure. After refining occupancies there are several residues with alternate conformers for which the sum of the occupancies is greater than one. For example: GLY A 197 O Occupancy sums to 1.14 MET B 17 CB Occupancy sums to 1.03 TYR B 142 CD1 Occupancy sums to 1.04 TYR B 142 CZ Occupancy sums to 1.01 GLY B 197 O Occupancy sums to 1.23 The density is defined nicely for them, do you know what can be the problem of why the sum could be more than 1? Thank you Mikalai

2 1

Restraints file for a new amino acid residue
by Agnes Thiane Pereira Machado 14 Nov '12

14 Nov '12

Hi We are trying to refine a protein structure with a (covalently) modified residue. The colosest discussion to our problem is: http://www.phenix-online.org/pipermail/phenixbb/2010-August/015629.html We ran: phenix.elbow --residue SSC ourmodel.pdb And read the due cif file at phenix refinement. The residue by itself is OK, but we were not able to perform the peptide bond between C and N. How to complete the .cif file such that it has due restraints for the peptide bond with this modified residue? Agnes

3 6