Hi Peter, yes, I would use the one after rigid-body refinement run in phenix.refine. Pavel. On 8/30/09 2:32 PM, Peter Grey wrote:
Hi Pavel,
Thank you very much for your fast answer. I just thought that maybe the bulk solvent correction procedure in phenix can really create better maps because with such big complexes I must use all low resolution data. Of course I can try both options but there are so many things to try with this big complex at low resolution that I would like to eliminate options where possible.
Many many thanks,
Peter.
On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 7:22 PM, Pavel Afonine
mailto:[email protected]> wrote: Hi Peter,
I guess this my reply will not replace Tom's or Randy's one...
> Should it be the 2mFo-DFc map directly from Phaser or would it be > better to do rigid body refinement in phenix.refine and use the bulk > solvent corrected 2mFo-DFc map ?
- why don't you try using both options and choose the best outcome?
- running a round of rigid body refinement in phenix.refine and using its 2mFo-DFc map will not hurt at least or may make your model and therefore the map better, so you will have a better starting point.
Pavel.
_______________________________________________ phenixbb mailing list [email protected] mailto:[email protected] http://www.phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/phenixbb
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ phenixbb mailing list [email protected] http://www.phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/phenixbb