Or you could have the test specify what version of Rosetta the results were
compiled with. It's a bit opaque right now.
Cheers,
Morten
On 7 January 2013 17:43, Terwilliger, Thomas C
Hi Morten,
Yes, you've guessed correctly that the regression tests do check the numbers in the output compared to a standard run. In some cases (as the two that you show) some minor change in the algorithms can give "failures" that are just due to small changes in algorithms. I think you can probably ignore these two errors. I'll be checking these here and I'll just have it ignore these differences if they are uninteresting.
All the best, Tom T
On Jan 7, 2013, at 6:35 AM, Morten Groftehauge wrote:
Hi guys,
I just updated Rosetta to 3.4 and it seems to have compiled correctly (at least no error interruptions). I've done this enough to not be satisfied by that and ran
phenix_regression.wizards.test_command_line_rosetta_quick which goes past the Rosetta tests correctly but fails at ================================================================= Running test_prerefine
Numbers do not match: 0.47825 0.53601 r {{ 0.87799 0.06946 -0.47362} {-0.02049 0.99396 0.10779} { 0.47825 -0.08494 0.87411}} --- r {{ 0.84375 0.06393 -0.53291} {-0.02789 0.99676 0.07541} { 0.53601 -0.04877 0.84280}}
------------------------------------------------------------
FAILED See log files test_prerefine/test_prerefine.log test_prerefine/test_prerefine_current.log ================================================================= Running test_prerefine_double OK ================================================================= Running test_prerefine_no_data ------------------------------------------------------------ Numbers do not match: 0.47825 0.53601 r {{ 0.87799 0.06946 -0.47362} {-0.02049 0.99396 0.10779} { 0.47825 -0.08494 0.87411}} --- r {{ 0.84375 0.06393 -0.53291} {-0.02789 0.99676 0.07541} { 0.53601 -0.04877 0.84280}}
------------------------------------------------------------
FAILED See log files test_prerefine_no_data/test_prerefine_no_data.log test_prerefine_no_data/test_prerefine_no_data_current.log ================================================================= When I look in the log there are no error messages. I don't need to prerefine so I'm good but I still find it weird. I tried again with Rosetta 3.3 and got no error flags.
Is it because the quick tests are checking the result against the results that you got earlier and the algorithm has been changed between 3.3 and 3.4?
Cheers, Morten
PS Really enjoyed the talks at the CCP4 study weekend.
-- Morten K Grøftehauge, PhD Pohl Group Durham University _______________________________________________ phenixbb mailing list [email protected] http://phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/phenixbb
_______________________________________________ phenixbb mailing list [email protected] http://phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/phenixbb
-- Morten K Grøftehauge, PhD Pohl Group Durham University