![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/1bedfb559da13e13dd90bed00402125c.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
Hi I am doing refinement using phenix. I did simulated annealing, Rfree goes up to 10% more than before. (40%) and R stays at 35%. If use previous phenix refinment file for same pdb and data , R and Rfree is 25/27%. I thought even different r-free set after simulated annealing and 7 cycles of refinement in phenix should bring Rfree down, but not ? But same data set and model , in CNS, R/Rfree 26/28%. Any suggestions will be appreciated. I am using phenix-dev249 - linux. thanks ram
![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/7984547b53fca6ae837ba286f9c92e29.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
Hi, - what if you do the exact same refinement but without SA? Do you still see the same behavior of R-factors? - does your input PDB file contain any ANISOU records? - if you send me the data and model (and the exact command you used), then I will be able to tell what exactly happens. Pavel.
I am doing refinement using phenix. I did simulated annealing, Rfree goes up to 10% more than before. (40%) and R stays at 35%. If use previous phenix refinment file for same pdb and data , R and Rfree is 25/27%. I thought even different r-free set after simulated annealing and 7 cycles of refinement in phenix should bring Rfree down, but not ?
But same data set and model , in CNS, R/Rfree 26/28%.
Any suggestions will be appreciated.
participants (2)
-
Pavel Afonine
-
r n