Hi all, It appears that the cif file generated from prodrg (REFMAC format) is not recognised by phenix during refinement. Did anyone have similar issues or i am doing something wrong? somehow the geometries obtained from elbow are not right for my ligand so had to use prodrg to generate cif files. thanks, Shya
I think prodrg used abc... etcetera to represent different atoms of the same element, while phenix uses numbers. You can hand edit this pretty easily, which is probably easier than editing the elbow produced cif to the correct geometry. However, it is also a good exercise to figure out how to hand correct the restraints at least one time. This is a common problem and we often try both elbow and prodrg, and sometimes neither will get it right for a complex ligand, so it is helpful to understand the restraint file.
Regards,
Kendall Nettles
On Jan 22, 2012, at 9:36 PM, "Shya Biswas"
Hi all, It appears that the cif file generated from prodrg (REFMAC format) is not recognised by phenix during refinement. Did anyone have similar issues or i am doing something wrong? somehow the geometries obtained from elbow are not right for my ligand so had to use prodrg to generate cif files. thanks, Shya _______________________________________________ phenixbb mailing list [email protected] http://phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/phenixbb
Thanks for your input, noticed that elbow does a better job with smiles
rather than pdb files.
Shya
On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 10:34 PM, Kendall Nettles
I think prodrg used abc... etcetera to represent different atoms of the same element, while phenix uses numbers. You can hand edit this pretty easily, which is probably easier than editing the elbow produced cif to the correct geometry. However, it is also a good exercise to figure out how to hand correct the restraints at least one time. This is a common problem and we often try both elbow and prodrg, and sometimes neither will get it right for a complex ligand, so it is helpful to understand the restraint file. Regards, Kendall Nettles
On Jan 22, 2012, at 9:36 PM, "Shya Biswas"
wrote: Hi all, It appears that the cif file generated from prodrg (REFMAC format) is not recognised by phenix during refinement. Did anyone have similar issues or i am doing something wrong? somehow the geometries obtained from elbow are not right for my ligand so had to use prodrg to generate cif files. thanks, Shya _______________________________________________ phenixbb mailing list [email protected] http://phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/phenixbb
phenixbb mailing list [email protected] http://phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/phenixbb
Hi Shya, can you explain what exactly the issue is with the elbow generated CIF file in your specific situation? Yes, SMILES string is a better input for elbow than PDB. Pavel On 1/22/12 6:35 PM, Shya Biswas wrote:
Hi all, It appears that the cif file generated from prodrg (REFMAC format) is not recognised by phenix during refinement. Did anyone have similar issues or i am doing something wrong? somehow the geometries obtained from elbow are not right for my ligand so had to use prodrg to generate cif files. thanks, Shya
Shya
The restraints CIF you sent me which you got from PRODRG has the first
line comment (#) removed. Our previous experience with using PRODRG
restraints file has been that phenix.refine will read them fine. Did
you edit the file?
Some of the better inputs to eLBOW include SMILES and PDB ligand eg
phenix.elbow --chemical-component=AZM
You can also check if there is an entry in the restraints library using
elbow.where_is_that_cif_file AZM
Cheers
Nigel
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 3:07 PM, Pavel Afonine
Hi Shya,
can you explain what exactly the issue is with the elbow generated CIF file in your specific situation?
Yes, SMILES string is a better input for elbow than PDB.
Pavel
On 1/22/12 6:35 PM, Shya Biswas wrote:
Hi all, It appears that the cif file generated from prodrg (REFMAC format) is not recognised by phenix during refinement. Did anyone have similar issues or i am doing something wrong? somehow the geometries obtained from elbow are not right for my ligand so had to use prodrg to generate cif files. thanks, Shya
_______________________________________________ phenixbb mailing list [email protected] http://phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/phenixbb
-- Nigel W. Moriarty Building 64R0246B, Physical Biosciences Division Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Berkeley, CA 94720-8235 Phone : 510-486-5709 Email : [email protected] Fax : 510-486-5909 Web : CCI.LBL.gov
Hi Pavel,
One of the bond angles in the sulphonamide groups SO2NH2 was not correct so
had to go into the cif file to correct the bond angle, in another instance
-CN bond angles were getting smaller than 180 degree (right after one round
of refinement in phenix) however i was told that these issues have been
taken care of in the recent version of phenix.
I will double check my refmac generated cif file and try running phenix
refine according to Nigels suggestion.
thanks,
shya
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 6:07 PM, Pavel Afonine
Hi Shya,
can you explain what exactly the issue is with the elbow generated CIF file in your specific situation?
Yes, SMILES string is a better input for elbow than PDB.
Pavel
On 1/22/12 6:35 PM, Shya Biswas wrote:
Hi all, It appears that the cif file generated from prodrg (REFMAC format) is not recognised by phenix during refinement. Did anyone have similar issues or i am doing something wrong? somehow the geometries obtained from elbow are not right for my ligand so had to use prodrg to generate cif files. thanks, Shya
______________________________**_________________ phenixbb mailing list [email protected] http://phenix-online.org/**mailman/listinfo/phenixbbhttp://phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/phenixbb
participants (4)
-
Kendall Nettles
-
Nigel Moriarty
-
Pavel Afonine
-
Shya Biswas