I don't see a need for that right now. Delta (le page) is rather large, twin stats do not indicate twinning. P On 15 February 2015 at 06:27, Smith Liu wrote:

Dear All,

I have done a Xtriage twinning analysis on my data. I summarize the result as following,

Twinning analysis summary: The results of the L-test indicate that the intensity statistics below as expected. No twinning is suspected. Multivariate Z score L-test: 1.625.

It further shows,

Possible twin operators o merohedral twin operator(s) found, 1 pseudo-merohedral twin operator(s) found. Type Axis R metric(%) delta(le Pa) delta (lebed) Twin law PM 2-fold 4.934 2.547 0.036 l -k h

Based on the above information, will you please advise me whether I need to input "l -k h" in the "Twin law" in "Other options" in "Refinement settings" in the Phenix refine graphical interface?

I am looking forward to getting your reply.

Smith

_______________________________________________ phenixbb mailing list [email protected] http://phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/phenixbb Unsubscribe: [email protected]

-- ----------------------------------------------------------------- P.H. Zwart Staff Scientist Berkeley Center for Structural Biology, Science lead Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratories 1 Cyclotron Road, Berkeley, CA-94703, USA Cell: 510 289 9246 SASTBX: http://sastbx.als.lbl.gov BCSB: http://bcsb.als.lbl.gov PHENIX: http://www.phenix-online.org -----------------------------------------------------------------